<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Women For Hire</title>
      <link>http://blog.womenforhire.com/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:54:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Being an Older Jobseeker Ain’t No Picnic</title>
         <description>“Companies are starting to hire again, but many are turning their backs on older job seekers.”  That’s the opening line from an article yesterday on CNN.com, which ran a headline announcing Job Blues for Gray-haired Workers.

If you’re over 40 and out of work, that’s hardly a news bulletin. 

Even though the national unemployment rate among older workers is lower than that of younger workers, none of the recent gains in hiring have occurred for the older bracket.  

Where are all the equal-opportunity employers and why don’t more (or any) business leaders truly embrace the philosophy of the founder of outdoor clothing giant Patagonia? </description>
         <link>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/being-an-older-jobseeker-aint.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/being-an-older-jobseeker-aint.html</guid>
<author>
      <name>Tory Johnson</name>
      
   </author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:54:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Performance Reviews: Results Count Now</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Employers are overhauling employee evaluations to better separate top performers from underachievers, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703964104575334832074865058.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_careerjournal">The Wall Street Journal</a> reports. Hewitt Associates estimates 10% of managers and 11% of other employees are now judged solely on the results, as opposed to a mix of results and softer metrics such as showing leadership, up from 7% and 8% five years ago. Nearly a third of execs are judged solely on results, up from just over a fifth in 2005.

]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/performance-reviews-results-co.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/performance-reviews-results-co.html</guid>
<author>
      <name>Workplace Buzz</name>
      
   </author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:37:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Mistakes Jobseekers Make</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703615104575328641186507512.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_careerjournal">The Wall Street Journal</a> takes a look at common mistakes that job seekers make, which recruiters say can take them out of the running. Among them: a sense of entitlement, rudeness, arrogance and lying. One recruiter says some of the behavior is so outrageous that she thinks she's being secretly taped by a TV reality show. ]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/mistakes-jobseekers-make-3.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/mistakes-jobseekers-make-3.html</guid>
<author>
      <name>Workplace Buzz</name>
      
   </author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:30:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Do You REALLY Want to Work?</title>
         <description>Almost every day I hear from people who have been out of work for many months—if not years. They say they&apos;re desperate to work. When I ask what they&apos;ve been doing and how the process is going, very often they tell me that they&apos;ve &quot;only&quot; been offered jobs that pay $8 to $10 an hour. That&apos;s followed by the same refrain from everyone, &quot;I can&apos;t possibly work for that little.&quot;</description>
         <link>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/do-you-really-want-to-work-1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/do-you-really-want-to-work-1.html</guid>
<author>
      <name>Tory Johnson</name>
      
   </author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:02:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Older Women Rock!</title>
         <description>Inc. is one of my favorite magazines and the June issue focuses on America’s best run companies. One of the top places to work is Patagonia, the outdoor apparel company based in California. When asked what he’d do to create the best workplace if he were starting a company today, founder Yvon Chouinard said, &quot;I&apos;d search out older women as employees.</description>
         <link>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/older-women-rock-1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/older-women-rock-1.html</guid>
<author>
      <name>Tory Johnson</name>
      
   </author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:48:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Survey of Execs: Hiring on Rise</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The Business Roundtable, <a href="http://www.areadevelopment.com/newsItems/6-23-2010/business-roundtable-ceo-curvey06236.shtml">a survey </a>of 106 CEOs from some of the country’s biggest corporations, finds that 39 percent of executives planned to increase hiring during the second half of 2010, the highest percentage since 2007. Only 17 percent of CEOs said they would lay off employees.
]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/survey-of-execs-hiring-on-rise.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/survey-of-execs-hiring-on-rise.html</guid>
<author>
      <name>Workplace Buzz</name>
      
   </author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:38:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Employers Cautious, Ask Staffs To Row Harder</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Business is picking up for many companies but employers are still asking employees to work overtime to fill the demand because they're still being cautious about making new hires, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2010-06-21-morehours21_ST_N.htm">USA TODAY reports</a>. Still, employers say they can't risk burning out workers with too much overtime and will begin hiring if the recovery continues.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/employers-cautious-ask-staffs.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/employers-cautious-ask-staffs.html</guid>
<author>
      <name>Workplace Buzz</name>
      
   </author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:10:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Demand For Cyberexperts Growing</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The federal government, education officials and giant military contractors are collaborating to recruit a new class of tech professionals trained to battle data thieves, online scammers and cyberspies. Community colleges are expanding cyber programs -- and drawing adults seeking to change or advance their careers, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/2010-06-21-cybersecurity21_ST_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip">USA TODAY reports</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/demand-for-cyberexperts-growin.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/demand-for-cyberexperts-growin.html</guid>
<author>
      <name>Workplace Buzz</name>
      
   </author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:03:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Bias and Flirting in the Hiring Process—Yea or Nay?</title>
         <description>Lots of reaction from you about job postings that require applicants to be currently employed. Most of you were outraged, but plenty weren’t surprised—having experienced it firsthand.

How about this one: Since we focus exclusively on women’s career advancement, we’re often approached by recruiters asking for recommendations of female candidates. But there’s sometimes a catch: No kids, no spouse, a willingness to put in long hours and travel.  Long hours and travel we can accept, but anytime there’s a demand about family and marital status, we refuse to engage.</description>
         <link>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/bias-and-flirting-in-the-hirin.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/bias-and-flirting-in-the-hirin.html</guid>
<author>
      <name>Tory Johnson</name>
      
   </author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:22:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>“Strangled by self doubt, fear of failure and low self esteem”</title>
         <description>I hear from women every day who are suffering greatly from job loss. My staff and I offer them whatever advice, leads and resources we can, but it’s often challenging since we can’t possibly give everyone the one-on-one help they really need. </description>
         <link>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/strangled-by-self-doubt-fear-o-1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/strangled-by-self-doubt-fear-o-1.html</guid>
<author>
      <name>Tory Johnson</name>
      
   </author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:36:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Is it OK for Recruiters to Say “Must be Currently Employed to Apply?”</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Talk about disturbing job ads. Last week <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/04/disturbing-job-ads-the-un_n_600665.html">The Huffington Post</a> got a ton of outraged reaction to a piece about how some companies are saying that job applicants “must be currently employed” to be considered. Seemed like an incredible tactic for any company to take, since it wrongly implies that if you’re out of work you’re lazy or worthless.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/is-it-ok-for-recruiters-to-say-1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/is-it-ok-for-recruiters-to-say-1.html</guid>
<author>
      <name>Tory Johnson</name>
      
   </author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:30:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Where the Jobs Are</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Industries that grew in April were education and health services, where openings rose 7% from March, and professional and business services, which grew about 24%. Government job openings saw the largest contraction--about 8.5% fewer public sector jobs were available in April than were available in March, <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704575304575296692796660262.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_careerjournal">The Wall Street Journal </a></em>reports.

]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/where-the-jobs-are.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/where-the-jobs-are.html</guid>
<author>
      <name>Workplace Buzz</name>
      
   </author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:28:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Good Sign: Resignations Outpace Layoffs</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Federal labor statistics show that nearly 2 million workers resigned from their jobs in April, while 1.75 million were laid off the same month. <em><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/Money/2010/0609/More-workers-quit-their-jobs-and-that-s-good-news-for-the-economy">The Christian Science Monitor </a></em>says it's a sign of economic recovery when resignations begin to outnumber layoffs because it shows workers feel confidence in their ability to find new work.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/good-sign-resignations-outpace.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/good-sign-resignations-outpace.html</guid>
<author>
      <name>Workplace Buzz</name>
      
   </author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:14:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Employers Lowball New Hires</title>
         <description><![CDATA[As the labor market slowly heals, some hiring managers are offering salaries lower than what workers previously received, <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB127570395821401453.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_careerjournal">The Wall Street Journal </a></em>reports. "Companies are more worried these days about margins, profitability, and they are cutting costs across the board. Even though [workers are] qualified and have prior experience, the hiring department has been told to set a budget at a lower range," says one career coach.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/employers-lowball-new-hires.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/employers-lowball-new-hires.html</guid>
<author>
      <name>Workplace Buzz</name>
      
   </author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:02:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Say Bye-Bye To Jobs For Life</title>
         <description><![CDATA[If the old paradigm was that you spent 40 years with the same company, we’re moving toward the opposite extreme, where workers are free agents and a job is less a landing spot than a way station, <em><a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/jobs/migrant_workers_3cuU325H5k9ND5PYbbnTPO">The New York Post </a></em>reports. "Companies are looking at talent in a more strategic way, and the idea of working a 40-hour, 9-to-5 job for the same company year after year will be less and less the norm," one expert says.


]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/say-byebye-to-jobs-for-life.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.womenforhire.com/2010/06/say-byebye-to-jobs-for-life.html</guid>
<author>
      <name>Workplace Buzz</name>
      
   </author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:02:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>

